The Most Favored Nation Principle: Passive Constraint or Active Commitment?

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

0
Citations

SCOPUS

0

초록

This study examines how the welfare implication of the "most-favored-nation" (MFN) principle changed when the trade agreement mode shifted from a "one-shot-multilateral-trade-agreement" to "sequential-bilateral-trade-agreements." It emphasizes that the MFN principle works as "passive constraints" in the former but "active commitments" in the latter. Under the sequential-bilateral-trade-agreements, (i) an importing country strategically takes a cost-efficient country as its first (second) trading partner when the MFN principle is (not) embedded, and (ii) embedding the MFN clause improves the trade surplus of the importing country and the world economy. The MFN principle is utilized by the cost-efficient country as a commitment device to encourage production. This principle reverses the welfare implication in the existing literature. Finally, the importing country prefers the sequential agreements with the MFN clause to other cases in which it can choose simultaneous or sequential agreements with/without the MFN clause.

키워드

Most-Favored-Nation Principle; Sequential Trade Agreements; Commitment; PRICE-DISCRIMINATION; INPUT MARKETS; TARIFFS; TRADE
제목
The Most Favored Nation Principle: Passive Constraint or Active Commitment?
저자
Suh, Jeongmeen; Nahm, Sihoon; Sim, Seung-Gyu
발행일
2016-06
유형
Article
저널명
The Korean Economic Review
권
32
호
1
페이지
77 ~ 99