Return to basics: Clustering of scientific literature using structural information

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

6
Citations

SCOPUS

10

초록

Scholars frequently employ relatedness measures to estimate the similarity between two different items (e.g., documents, authors, and institutes). Such relatedness measures are commonly based on overlapping references (i.e., bibliographic coupling) or citations (i.e., co-citation) and can then be used with cluster analysis to find boundaries between research fields. Unfortunately, calculating a relatedness measure is challenging, especially for a large number of items, because the computational complexity is greater than linear. We propose an alternative method for identifying research fronts that uses direct citation inspired by relatedness measures. Our novel approach simply replicates a node into two distinct nodes: a citing node and cited node. We then apply typical clustering methods to the modified network. Clusters of citing nodes should emulate those from the bibliographic coupling relatedness network, while clusters of cited nodes should act like those from the co-citation relatedness network. In validation tests, our proposed method demonstrated high levels of similarity with conventional relatedness-based methods. We also found that the clustering results of the proposed method outperformed those of conventional relatedness-based measures regarding similarity with natural language processing-based classification. © 2020 The Authors

키워드

Bibliographic couplingBipartite networkClusteringCo-citationMappingRelatednessBibliographic retrieval systemsBibliographiesCluster analysisClustering algorithmsBibliographic couplingsClustering methodsClustering resultsNAtural language processingRelatedness measuresResearch fieldsScientific literatureStructural informationNatural language processing systems
제목
Return to basics: Clustering of scientific literature using structural information
저자
Yun, J.Ahn, S.Lee, J.Y.
DOI
10.1016/j.joi.2020.101099
발행일
2020-11
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Informetrics
14
4