千字文의 受容과 텍스트에 관한 韓日比較硏究

초록

This study deals with acceptation of Cheonjamun in Korea and Japan in side of its text, selectes presentative texts, compares and considers about original text. By considering it can estimate when original texts of the two nations are established. In case of Japan, almost existing texts have annotation and all of Japanese texts in this study deals with Cheonjamun annotated by Li Seom. However it is common that Korean Cheonjamun texts have not annotation, there is one meaning and one sound of Hanzi each characters. Moreover in the two nations Cheonjamun are used to elementary study of Hanzi, but in Korea it is regarded as importance comparison with Japan. Cheonjamun, in side of contents and difficulty, is not easy to understand. Althought Korean considers as book for beginner. This consider result from way and purpose of studying of Chosen era. This study deals with Ueno-bon, the oldest text of Japan when it is written and put Kunten(punctuation mark on Chinese text) 13th century and Tōdai-bon(15th century) as Japanese Cheonjamun texts. In result of comparison with contents of these two texts, there are 26 different points. There are 4 different points result from avoiding True name, it is changed original text. I found through this study, original text of Ueno-bon is established in the mid-tenth century, original text of Tōdai-bon established after end of eleventh century. In result of comparison with Kwangju text and Seokbong text what are Korean Cheonjamun texts and Difference between Ueno-bon and Tōdai-bon, it is considered that Korean texts are established before mid 10th century. I will deal with traditional study of Cheonjamun in Japan and Korea on the basis of this study.

키워드